I have a new hero.  May your tribe increase, Mr. Coleman.  It must gall him that TWC has sold out to this stupid fantasy, even devoting a weekly show to pushing Global Warming.

FYI, here's his bio from KUSI-TV in San Diego, where he holds his "retirement job". 

When you put the clowns in charge, don't be surprised when a circus breaks out.

Mr. Coleman makes a mistake in not considering the sun is in a state of fluctuation. While he is correct on the scam of global warming being exposed as a fraud, the sun in this period is destined to do what yellow dwarf stars do as our's is destined to do in literally scorching the earth.

There is a reason the Bible predicts in Revelation of Jesus the Christ that people are in "caves" and the sun is scorching people.
Now the Bible was written 2000 years ago in the last chapter approximately and yet it explains completely a yellow dwarf event which scientists see throughout the galaxy.

People will survive, but even Mr. Coleman has to take into all considerations and assist that America needs to implement a policy of taking global warming scam funds and using them as grants for homeowners to build and stock shelters........not just for the weather, but while we petered away 2 decades the Russians have been building huge underground cities for a nuclear war they are preparing for.

This building program would help the American economy immensely and spare allot of hardship. It is the prudent thing to do now that the scam is being defeated and we prepare for the next power grab of the globalists "using food shortage scam from bio fuels and water shortages".

*HIC IACET ARTORIVS REX QVONDAM REXQVE FVTVRVS

Hey Boxer and rest of the left loons in just Congress are you listening?

Inhofe is going to love this!

Thanks coffee and Noel...I am tickled pink...hehehee

Hmmmm...I wonder how Heidi Cullen is feeling about this all....

May I ask what Coleman's credentials are in terms of reading weather patterns and data?

The man must have read my mind. 

I'd also add. Those who claim the science is settled. And that those who disagree should be silenced, aren't scientist.

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

John Coleman is listed here:

NO 'Consensus' on "Man-Made" Global Warming

The Anti "Man-Made" Global Warming Resource

My wife and I spent a lot of years living in San Diego while I as on active duty in the Navy. During our time there, we came to love watching John Coleman on KUSI Channel 9. He is so full of energy, and he has a great resume to boot.

If you are ever in San Diego on a Friday night, make sure you watch the KUSI news at 9pm or 10pm.

assuming journalism hasn't been completely replaced by propagandist activism

you assume much there Felix  :^)

I've been watching John here in San Diego for the last ten years or so and he is the best. Other "weathermen" pale in comparison. John is a bonafide meteoroligist and is one of the most adept at using his "super computer" to make his forecasts (which are amazingly accurate!). The station he is on (KUSI- emphasis is John's! you'd have to hear him say it...) is an independent (no more networks for John!) and he pretty much has the run of the place. He is the one everyone in San Diego was watching during the fires here a couple weeks ago and he was dead on about when the Santa Ana winds would end. I value his forecasts more than any other here in San Diego and now I have even more reason to call him my favorite!

Beats bitter and angry.

Feel better now? Next time just cut to the chase and let 'er rip! Give us all ya' got.

The Global Warming nonsense is in the same league as the South Sea Bubble and Dutch Tulip Mania. (see the marvellous book written in the 1850s "Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds")

In years to come as the earth goes through the periodic cooling phase books will be written  about this strange phenomenon - but until then we have to put up with the hypcritical Gore slug. It is unfortunate.

The Scientific  Method vrs the Actual Method. I think I see warmer magic here.

Also here. Going to here. Then.

"There is a clear attempt to establish truth not by scientific methods but by perpetual repetition."
- Richard S. Lindzen, Ph.D. Professor of Meteorology, MIT

Extraordinary Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, written in the 19th century.  Read Malthus about how we will all starve to death by the year 1900.

If they so disagree with the climate change science, then why don`t they take it up with their own American Metreological Society first - are they calling all of their colleagues who disagree with them "dastardly" or "environmental whacko" types? The AMS Council in 2003 approved a long statement that included the following:
http://www.ametsoc.o...

[T]here is convincing evidence that since the industrial revolution, human activities, resulting in increasing concentrations of greenhouse gases and other trace constituents in the atmosphere, have become a major agent of climate change.

During the industrial period, the atmospheric abundance of carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, halocarbons (e.g., chlorofluorocarbons), and tropospheric ozone have increased as a direct result of human activity. The increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has come largely from fossil fuel combustion and land clearing. Methane is produced in anoxic environments in wetlands, agriculture, and landfills, and is also inadvertently released to the atmosphere during energy exploration and delivery. Nitrous oxide is formed by microbial reactions in soils and waters, including those acting on the increasing amounts of nitrogen contained in fertilizers. The major sources of chlorofluorocarbons are refrigerants, industrial uses, and aerosol propellants. Tropospheric ozone is formed by photochemical reactions involving emissions of methane and pollutants and is the third most important greenhouse gas after carbon dioxide and methane. However, the relative effect of carbon dioxide dominates all other anthropogenic increases of greenhouse gases since the industrial revolution. An overwhelming majority of scientists agree on the following facts relating to the global warming issue.

- The theory of how greenhouse gases directly interact with atmospheric radiation is not controversial. If no other factors counter their influence, increases in their concentration will lead to global warming.
- A steady rise in the concentration of greenhouse gases began over 200 years ago and is continuing. Atmospheric concentration of carbon dioxide, the principal greenhouse gas, has increased from pre-industrial concentrations of 280 ppmv (parts per million by volume) to over 367 ppmv in 2000, an increase of more than 30%; methane has increased from 0.7 to about 1.8 ppmv, an increase of more than 150%; nitrous oxide has increased from 0.27 to over 0.31 ppmv, an increase of 16%. Tropospheric ozone is estimated to have increased by 35% since the industrial revolution.
- At current rates and modes of energy use, doubling of carbon dioxide relative to preindustrial levels is likely to occur by the mid- or late twenty-first century.
- If we were to proceed on our present course until the current global inventory of known oil and coal deposits are exhausted, carbon dioxide concentrations could reach 4-6 times those of preindustrial levels.
- Because carbon dioxide is not destroyed chemically in the atmosphere, centuries and longer will be required before the added carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere to the deep ocean and geologic reservoirs.

Informed policy decisions of government and industry demand unbiased assessments of scientific results by the scientific community. The nature of science is such that there is rarely total agreement among scientists. ...

Because human activities are contributing to and accelerating climate change, we have a collective responsibility to develop and undertake carefully considered response actions. The fundamental challenge is to manage the risk represented by climate change in the larger context of overall societal issues and environmental stresses.

Besides taking it up with the AMS, and all of the scientists from the US and elsewhere who contribute to the IPCC, it`s not clear what it is that Coleman is saying - that climate change is a "scam" by a huge array of wacko or evil scientists, their friends in government, eEnvironmental extremists, notable politicians, movie, media and other liberal, environmentalist journalists who have created a wild “scientific” scenario of the civilization threatening environmental consequences from Global Warming unless we adhere to their radical agenda?

If so, where can we find any documents outlining the scam? There are plenty of Republicans (didn`t Bush`s Dad start all this?), leading corporations, evangelicals etc in on this - so there`s got to be something somewhere spelling out the goals, benefits and marching orders, right? A scam this big ought to be pretty leaky.

I am especially curious as to what the "radical agenda" of all these diverse parties is.

Next, how did these scammers manage to convince almost all of our other allies to go along? Twist their arms, buy them off? Corrupt all of their scientists with fake research jobs from our budget?

And, finally, how did they manage to turn Pres. Bush and his science adviser?

Pres. George Bush: "Our guiding principle is clear. We must lead the world to produce fewer greenhouse gas emissions and we must do it in a way that does not undermine economic growth or prevent nations from delivering greater prosperity for their people."